* Kees Cook: > I significantly prefer APIs not being arch-specific, so I'd prefer we > always include AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK. For an architecture that doesn't > define its own ARCH_AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK, it's not _inaccurate_ to report > 1 << PAGE_SHIFT, but it might be incomplete. The downside is that as an application programmer, I have to go and chase for the information the legacy way if I encounter getauxval(AT_PAGE_SHIFT_MASK) == getpagesize() for a longer time because the interface does not signal the absence of any extended page sizes. Thanks, Florian
