Am 10/20/2023 um 7:56 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
Am 10/20/2023 um 5:24 PM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:
Hi Paul,
On 2023/10/20 22:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
So if there are things that rcu_dereference.rst is missing, they do
need to be added.
As far as I can see, there is no mention of "address dependency"
in rcu_dereference.rst.
Yes, I see the discussion in rcu_dereference.rst is all about how
not to break address dependency by proper uses of rcu_dereference()
and its friends. But that might not be obvious for readers who
followed the references placed in memory-barriers.txt.
Using the term "address dependency" somewhere in rcu_dereference.rst
should help such readers, I guess.
I think that's a good point.
How about the commit shown at the end of this email,
I think it's very clear.
with a Reported-by for both of you?
I haven't reported anything.
[...]
Thanks for the response, I started thinking my mails aren't getting through
again.
Jonas, FWIW, your email archived at
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
didn't reach my gmail inbox. I looked for it in the spam folder,
but couldn't find it there either.
[...]
Thanks Akira!
I wrote the gmail support a while ago, but no response.
Currently no idea who to talk to... Oh well.
Your emails used to end up in my spam folder quite frequently, but
they have been coming through since you changed your email address.
In return, I receive all mail from the mailing list, if is also
addressed to me, twice.
So it evens out, somehow? (I suspect this is a configuration error in my
mail filters on my side though)
Have a lot of fun,
jonas
