Hi Russell, > On 20 Oct 2023, at 13:59, Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> > > acpi_device_is_present() checks the present or functional bits > from the cached copy of _STA. > > A few places open-code this check. Use the helper instead to > improve readability. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Jonathan Cameron suggests "Pull this one out and send it upstream in > advance of the rest" so let's do that. See > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914130455.00004434@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > So, let's get this upstream to reduce the number of outstanding patches > for aarch64 vcpu hotplug. > > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index 691d4b7686ee..ed01e19514ef 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device *adev) > int error; > > acpi_bus_get_status(adev); > - if (adev->status.present || adev->status.functional) { > + if (acpi_device_is_present(adev)) { > /* > * This function is only called for device objects for which > * matching scan handlers exist. The only situation in which > @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used) > int error; > > acpi_bus_get_status(adev); > - if (!(adev->status.present || adev->status.functional)) { > + if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) { Reviewed-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you Miguel > acpi_scan_device_not_present(adev); > return 0; > } > -- > 2.30.2 > >