Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/mempolicy: Implement set_mempolicy2 and get_mempolicy2 syscalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 02:30:08PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:54:56 -0400
> Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> > index 1d6eee30eceb..ec54064de8b3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> > @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@
> >  451	common	cachestat		sys_cachestat
> >  452	common	fchmodat2		sys_fchmodat2
> >  453	64	map_shadow_stack	sys_map_shadow_stack
> > +454	common	set_mempolicy2		sys_set_mempolicy2
> > +455	common	get_mempolicy2		sys_get_mempolicy2
> >  

^^ this is the discrepency.  map_shadow_stack is at 453, so NR_syscalls
should already be 454, but map_shadow_stack has not be plumbed through
the rest of the kernel.

This needs to be addressed, but not in this RFC.

> >  #undef __NR_syscalls
> > -#define __NR_syscalls 453
> > +#define __NR_syscalls 456
> +3 for 2 additions?
> 

see above



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux