On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 02:30:08PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 19:54:56 -0400 > Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > index 1d6eee30eceb..ec54064de8b3 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > @@ -375,6 +375,8 @@ > > 451 common cachestat sys_cachestat > > 452 common fchmodat2 sys_fchmodat2 > > 453 64 map_shadow_stack sys_map_shadow_stack > > +454 common set_mempolicy2 sys_set_mempolicy2 > > +455 common get_mempolicy2 sys_get_mempolicy2 > > ^^ this is the discrepency. map_shadow_stack is at 453, so NR_syscalls should already be 454, but map_shadow_stack has not be plumbed through the rest of the kernel. This needs to be addressed, but not in this RFC. > > #undef __NR_syscalls > > -#define __NR_syscalls 453 > > +#define __NR_syscalls 456 > +3 for 2 additions? > see above
