Re: [PATCH V11 07/17] riscv: qspinlock: Introduce qspinlock param for command line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/10/23 04:29, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Allow cmdline to force the kernel to use queued_spinlock when
CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS=y.

Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 ++
  arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                       | 16 +++++++++++++++-
  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 7dfb540c4f6c..61cacb8dfd0e 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -4693,6 +4693,8 @@
  			[KNL] Number of legacy pty's. Overwrites compiled-in
  			default number.
+ qspinlock [RISCV] Force to use qspinlock or auto-detect spinlock.
+
  	qspinlock.numa_spinlock_threshold_ns=	[NUMA, PV_OPS]
  			Set the time threshold in nanoseconds for the
  			number of intra-node lock hand-offs before the

Your patch series is still based on top of numa-aware qspinlock patchset which isn't upstream yet. Please rebase it without that as that will cause merge conflict during upstream merge.

Cheers,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux