Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] riscv: Improve flush_tlb_kernel_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alexandre,

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 1:01 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 1:49 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 9:58 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This function used to simply flush the whole tlb of all harts, be more
> > > subtile and try to only flush the range.
> > >
> > > The problem is that we can only use PAGE_SIZE as stride since we don't know
> > > the size of the underlying mapping and then this function will be improved
> > > only if the size of the region to flush is < threshold * PAGE_SIZE.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 11 +++++-----
> > >  arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c          | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > After applying this patch, I am seeing module load issues on RZ/Five
> > (complete log [0]). I am testing defconfig + [1] (rz/five related
> > configs).
> >
> > Any pointers on what could be an issue here?
>
> Can you give me the exact version of the kernel you use? The trap
> addresses are vmalloc addresses, and a fix for those landed very late
> in the release cycle.
>
I am using next-20230906, Ive pushed a branch [1] for you to have a look.

[0] https://github.com/prabhakarlad/linux/tree/rzfive-debug

Cheers,
Prabhakar




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux