On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:47:26PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 16:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I can certainly update it to do that, I was just trying to fit in > > with > > how the code was written on the basis that there was probably a good > > reason for it that had been discussed somewhere. I can send an > > incremental patch for this on top of the x86 patches assuming they go > > in > > during the merge window. > There was something like that on the x86 series way back, but it was > dropped[0]. IIRC risc-v was going to try to do something other than > VM_SHADOW_STACK, so they may conflict some day. But in the meantime, > adding a CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SHADOW_STACK here in the arm series makes > sense to me. OK, I'll do that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
