Re: [PATCH v5 11/37] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 04:47:26PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 16:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I can certainly update it to do that, I was just trying to fit in
> > with
> > how the code was written on the basis that there was probably a good
> > reason for it that had been discussed somewhere.  I can send an
> > incremental patch for this on top of the x86 patches assuming they go
> > in
> > during the merge window.

> There was something like that on the x86 series way back, but it was
> dropped[0]. IIRC risc-v was going to try to do something other than
> VM_SHADOW_STACK, so they may conflict some day. But in the meantime,
> adding a CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SHADOW_STACK here in the arm series makes
> sense to me.

OK, I'll do that.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux