Re: [PATCH V5 2/8] x86/hyperv: Set Virtual Trust Level in VMBus init message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:59:35PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 9:04 AM
> >  [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
> > @@ -378,6 +378,41 @@ static void __init hv_get_partition_id(void)
> >  	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  }
> > 
> > +static u8 __init get_vtl(void)
> > +{
> > +	u64 control = HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_1 |
> > HVCALL_GET_VP_REGISTERS;
> > +	struct hv_get_vp_registers_input *input;
> > +	struct hv_get_vp_registers_output *output;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	u64 ret;
> 
> This should be
> 	u64 ret = 0;
> 
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	input = *this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_input_arg);
> > +	output = (struct hv_get_vp_registers_output *)input;
> > +	if (!input) {
> > +		local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +		goto done;
> 
> Here the uninitialized 'ret' is returned. 
> 
> If we move the "done:" label one line earlier, we won't need the 
> the above " local_irq_restore(flags);"
> Maybe we should add a WARN_ON_ONCE(1) before "goto done"?

Out of interest why will input be NULL here?

Thanks,
Wei.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux