Re: [PATCH v3 21/36] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:20:58AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> The 07/31/2023 14:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> > +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsigned int, flags)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long alloc_size;
> > +	unsigned long __user *cap_ptr;
> > +	unsigned long cap_val;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!system_supports_gcs())
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	if (flags)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (addr % 16)
> > +		return -EINVAL;

> mmap addr must be page aligned (and there is no align req on size).

> i'd expect similar api here.

That's not what the manual page or a quick check of the code suggest
that mmap() does, they say that the kernel just takes it as a hint and
chooses a nearby page boundary, though I didn't test.  I'm not sure why
I have that alignment check at all TBH, and to the extent it's needed I
could just be 8 - this level of code doesn't really care.

> > +	if (size == 16 || size % 16)
> > +		return -EINVAL;

> why %16 and not %8 ?

I don't think that's needed any more - there was some stuff in an
earlier version of the code but no longer.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux