Compiling big-endian targets with Clang produces the diagnostic:
fs/namei.c:2173:13: warning: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands
[-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
} while (!(has_zero(a, &adata, &constants) | has_zero(b, &bdata, &constants)));
~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
||
fs/namei.c:2173:13: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence
this warning
It appears that when has_zero was introduced, two definitions were
produced with different signatures (in particular different return types).
Looking at the usage in hash_name() in fs/namei.c, I suspect that
has_zero() is meant to be invoked twice per while loop iteration; using
logical-or would not update `bdata` when `a` did not have zeros. So I
think it's preferred to always return an unsigned long rather than a
bool then update the while loop in hash_name() to use a logical-or
rather than bitwise-or.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1832
Fixes: 36126f8f2ed8 ("word-at-a-time: make the interfaces truly generic")
Debugged-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-generic/word-at-a-time.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/word-at-a-time.h b/include/asm-generic/word-at-a-time.h
index 20c93f08c993..95a1d214108a 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/word-at-a-time.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/word-at-a-time.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline long find_zero(unsigned long mask)
return (mask >> 8) ? byte : byte + 1;
}
-static inline bool has_zero(unsigned long val, unsigned long *data, const struct word_at_a_time *c)
+static inline unsigned long has_zero(unsigned long val, unsigned long *data, const struct word_at_a_time *c)
{
unsigned long rhs = val | c->low_bits;
*data = rhs;
---
base-commit: 18b44bc5a67275641fb26f2c54ba7eef80ac5950
change-id: 20230801-bitwise-7812b11e5fb7
Best regards,
--
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
