Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: stack: Fixup independent softirq stack for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 09:45:52AM -0400, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The independent softirq stack uses s0 to save & restore sp, but s0 would
> be corrupted when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. So add s0 in the clobber list
> to fix the problem.
> 
> Fixes: dd69d07a5a6c ("riscv: stack: Support HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK")
> Reported-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c
> index d0577cc6a081..0b58720109db 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
>  		:
>  		: [sp] "r" (sp)
>  		: "a0", "a1", "a2", "a3", "a4", "a5", "a6", "a7",
> -		  "t0", "t1", "t2", "t3", "t4", "t5", "t6",
> +		  "t0", "t1", "t2", "t3", "t4", "t5", "t6", "s0",
>  		  "memory");
>  	} else
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux