On Mon, Jun 12 2023 at 17:20, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 10/06/2023 23:10:02, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> This needs more thoughts to avoid a completely inconsistent duct tape
>> mess.
>
> Despite the test against smt_enabled_at_boot, mentioned above, I can't see
> anything else to rework. Am I missing something?
See my comments on the core code changes.
>> Btw, the command line parser and the variable smt_enabled_at_boot being
>> type int allow negative number of threads too... Maybe not what you want.
>
> I do agree, it should an unsigned type.
I assume you'll fix that yourself. :)
Thanks,
tglx
