On Mon, Jun 12 2023 at 17:20, Laurent Dufour wrote: > On 10/06/2023 23:10:02, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> This needs more thoughts to avoid a completely inconsistent duct tape >> mess. > > Despite the test against smt_enabled_at_boot, mentioned above, I can't see > anything else to rework. Am I missing something? See my comments on the core code changes. >> Btw, the command line parser and the variable smt_enabled_at_boot being >> type int allow negative number of threads too... Maybe not what you want. > > I do agree, it should an unsigned type. I assume you'll fix that yourself. :) Thanks, tglx