Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: >> On 6/1/23 12:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:21:22PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > >> > > It would be nice to have the hack more localized to parisc >> > > and guarded with a CONFIG_GCC_VERSION check so we can kill >> > > it off in the future, once we drop either gcc-10 or parisc >> > > support. >> > >> > I vote for dropping parisc -- it's the only 64bit arch that doesn't have >> > sane atomics. >> >> Of course I'm against dropping parisc. > > :-) > >> > Anyway, the below seems to work -- build tested with GCC-10.1 >> >> I don't think we need to care about gcc-10 on parisc. >> Debian and Gentoo are the only supported distributions, while Debian >> requires gcc-12 to build > 6.x kernels, and I assume Gentoo uses at least >> gcc-12 as well. >> >> So raising the gcc limit for parisc only (at least temporarily for now) >> should be fine and your workaround below wouldn't be necessary, right? > > Correct, if you're willing to set minimum GCC version to 11 for parisc > all is well and this patch can go play in the bit bucket. It's fine for us in Gentoo, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
