On Thu, May 18, 2023, at 15:09, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Why 32-bit Linux?
> =================
> The motivation for using a 32-bit Linux kernel is to reduce memory
> footprint and meet the small capacity of DDR & cache requirement
> (e.g., 64/128MB SIP SoC).
>
> Here are the 32-bit v.s. 64-bit Linux kernel data type comparison
> summary:
> 32-bit 64-bit
> sizeof(page): 32bytes 64bytes
> sizeof(list_head): 8bytes 16bytes
> sizeof(hlist_head): 8bytes 16bytes
> sizeof(vm_area): 68bytes 136bytes
> ...
> Mem-usage:
> (s32ilp32) # free
> total used free shared buff/cache available
> Mem: 100040 8380 88244 44 3416 88080
>
> (s64lp64) # free
> total used free shared buff/cache available
> Mem: 91568 11848 75796 44 3924 75952
>
> (s64ilp32) # free
> total used free shared buff/cache available
> Mem: 101952 8528 90004 44 3420 89816
> ^^^^^
>
> It's a rough measurement based on the current default config without any
> modification, and 32-bit (s32ilp32, s64ilp32) saved more than 16% memory
> to 64-bit (s64lp64). But s32ilp32 & s64ilp32 have a similar memory
> footprint (about 0.33% difference), meaning s64ilp32 has a big chance to
> replace s32ilp32 on the 64-bit machine.
I've tried to run the same numbers for the debate about running
32-bit vs 64-bit arm kernels in the past, but focused mostly on
slightly larger systems, but I looked mainly at the 512MB case,
as that is the most cost-efficient DDR3 memory configuration
and fairly common.
What I'd like to understand better in your example is where
the 14MB of memory went. I assume this is for 128MB of total
RAM, so we know that 1MB went into additional 'struct page'
objects (32 bytes * 32768 pages). It would be good to know
where the dynamic allocations went and if they are reclaimable
(e.g. inodes) or non-reclaimable (e.g. kmalloc-128).
For the vmlinux size, is this already a minimal config
that one would run on a board with 128MB of RAM, or a
defconfig that includes a lot of stuff that is only relevant
for other platforms but also grows on 64-bit?
What do you see in /proc/slabinfo, /proc/meminfo/, and
'size vmlinux' for the s64ilp32 and s64lp64 kernels here?
Arnd
