> >> +void check_hv_pending_irq_enable(void) > >> +{ > >> + struct pt_regs regs; > >> + > >> + if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP)) > >> + return; > >> + > >> + memset(®s, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs)); > >> + asm volatile("movl %%cs, %%eax;" : "=a" (regs.cs)); > >> + asm volatile("movl %%ss, %%eax;" : "=a" (regs.ss)); > >> + regs.orig_ax = 0xffffffff; > >> + regs.flags = native_save_fl(); > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * Disable irq when handle pending #HV events after > >> + * re-enabling irq. > >> + */ > >> + asm volatile("cli" : : : "memory"); > > Just curious, Does the hypervisor injects irqs via doorbell page when > > interrupts are disabled with "cli" ? Trying to understand the need to > > cli/sti covering on "do_exc_hv". > > > Hi Pankaj: > Thanks for your review. Yes, Hypervisor still injects #HV exception > when irq was disabled check_hv_pending() is called when > there is a #HV exception. It checks irq flag and return back without > handling irq event when irq was disabled. o.k. Thanks for your reply! I am clear with this part. But want to know if there is possibility when "do_exc_hv" would keep handling irqs in the continuous while loop i.e from the update in the hv doorbell page and that can result in DOS like scenario? Is there is already a protection for this? Thanks, Pankaj