On 3/15/23 17:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:12 PM Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
>> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
>> those drivers using them.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
>> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ endif # HAS_DMA
>>
>> config ATA_SFF
>> bool "ATA SFF support (for legacy IDE and PATA)"
>> + depends on HAS_IOPORT
>> default y
>> help
>> This option adds support for ATA controllers with SFF
>
> ATA_SFF is a dependency for lots of (S)ATA drivers.
> (at least) The following don't use I/O port access:
>
> CONFIG_SATA_RCAR (arm/arm64)
> CONFIG_PATA_FALCON (m68k/atari and m68k/q40)
> CONFIG_PATA_GAYLE (m68k/amiga)
> CONFIG_PATA_BUDDHA (m68k/amiga)
>
> (at least) The following can use either MMIO or I/O port accesses:
>
> CONFIG_PATA_PLATFORM (m68k/mac)
But for these arch/platforms, would there be any reason to not have HAS_IOPORT ?
It is supported right now, so we should have HAS_IOPORT for them.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
