Re: [Patch v4 06/13] x86/hyperv: Change vTOM handling to use standard coco mechanisms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 05:37:00PM +0000, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> OK.  I have no objection to putting that code in a separate "helper"
> function.  The only slight messiness is that the helper function must
> be separately wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT, or
> marked __maybe_unused.

I'd vote for __maybe_unused as that doesn't mean more ifdeffery.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux