[PATCH memory-model 3/4] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.

Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
index 0f1ffa03db09a..d7adc6d543db4 100644
--- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
+++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
 
 Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
 indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
-while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
+while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
 guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
 transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
 
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux