On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:35:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to replace cmpxchg_double() with the newly minted
> cmpxchg128() family of functions, wire it up in this_cpu_cmpxchg().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
> +#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_16(pcp, oval, nval) \
> +({ \
> + u128 old__ = __pcpu_cast_128((nval), (nval)); \
> + u128 new__ = __pcpu_cast_128((oval), (oval)); \
spot the bug... please merge the below into this patch.
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
index 24a4d9d644c0..d1997d01892a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@
#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_16(pcp, oval, nval) \
({ \
- u128 old__ = __pcpu_cast_128((nval), (nval)); \
- u128 new__ = __pcpu_cast_128((oval), (oval)); \
+ u128 old__ = __pcpu_cast_128((oval), (oval)); \
+ u128 new__ = __pcpu_cast_128((nval), (nval)); \
typedef typeof(pcp) pcp_op_T__; \
pcp_op_T__ *ptr__; \
u128 ret__; \
