[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; all text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 02.01.23 05:16, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:45:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux >> since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the >> link order of head.o"). > [...] > I just bisected this change as the cause of a few link failures that we > now see in CI with Debian's binutils (2.35.2): > > https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/clangbuiltlinux/continuous-integration2/builds/2Jjl88DXc3YRi2RtvXAzlS8NQ4p/build.log > > This does not appear to be related to clang/LLVM because I can easily > reproduce it with Debian's s390x GCC and binutils building defconfig: > > [...] > > I ended up bisecting binutils for the fix, as I could not reproduce it > with 2.36+. My bisect landed on commit 21401fc7bf6 ("Duplicate output > sections in scripts"): > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=21401fc7bf67dbf73f4a3eda4bcfc58fa4211584 > > Unfortunately, I cannot immediately grok why this commit cause the above > issue nor why the binutils commit resolves it so I figured I would > immediately report it for public investigation's sake and quicker > resolution. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 99cb0d917ffa1ab628bb67364ca9b162c07699b1 #regzbot title arch: link failures in CI with Debian's binutils #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in the footer of this mail. Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (see page linked in footer for details). Ciao, Thorsten -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr Annoyed by mails like this? Feel free to send them to /dev/null: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#infomails