On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 7:02 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey Masahiro,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 04:06:35AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 12:18 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 04:27:51AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > Dennis Gilmore reports that the BuildID is missing in the arm64 vmlinux
> > > > since commit 994b7ac1697b ("arm64: remove special treatment for the
> > > > link order of head.o").
> > > >
> > > > The issue is that the type of .notes section, which contains the BuildID,
> > > > changed from NOTES to PROGBITS.
> > > >
> > > > Ard Biesheuvel figured out that whichever object gets linked first gets
> > > > to decide the type of a section, and the PROGBITS type is the result of
> > > > the compiler emitting .note.GNU-stack as PROGBITS rather than NOTE.
> > > >
> > > > While Ard provided a fix for arm64, I want to fix this globally because
> > > > the same issue is happening on riscv since commit 2348e6bf4421 ("riscv:
> > > > remove special treatment for the link order of head.o"). This problem
> > > > will happen in general for other architectures if they start to drop
> > > > unneeded entries from scripts/head-object-list.txt.
> > > >
> > > > Discard .note.GNU-stack in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.
> > > >
> > > > riscv needs to change its linker script so that DISCARDS comes before
> > > > the .notes section.
> > >
> > > No idea why I decided to look at patchwork today, but this seems to
> > > break the build on RISC-V, there's a whole load of the following in the
> > > output:
> > > `.LPFE4' referenced in section `__patchable_function_entries' of kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o: defined in discarded section `.text.exit' of kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.o
> > >
> > > I assume that's what's doing it, but given the day that's in it - I
> > > haven't looked into this any further, nor gone and fished the logs out of
> > > the builder.
> >
> >
> > arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S clearly says:
> > /* we have to discard exit text and such at runtime, not link time */
> >
> > riscv already relies on the linker not discarding EXIT_{TEXT,DATA}
> > so riscv should define RUNTIME_DISCARD_EXIT like x86, arm64.
>
> Huh, fair enough. The diff for that appears to be trivial, but I was not
> able to correctly determine a fixes tag. I may have erred in my
> history-diving, but it's a wee bit hard to determine the correct fixes
> tag. That comment about runtime discards appears to date back to
> commit fbe934d69eb7 ("RISC-V: Build Infrastructure") in 2017 -
> apparently pre-dating the addition of the define in the first place.
>
> Commit 84d5f77fc2ee ("x86, vmlinux.lds: Add RUNTIME_DISCARD_EXIT to
> generic DISCARDS") added it to x86 but not to arm64 - but it seems like
> it was added to arm during a later reword. Does that make 84d5f77fc2ee
> the correct one to mark it as a fix of & riscv was just overlooked when
> the define was added?
>
You do not need to add the Fixes tag.
Currently, it is working, but it turns out bad
only when somebody moves "DISCARDS" up in the linker script.
> > Anyway, I came up with a simpler patch, so I do not need to
> > touch around arch linker scripts.
> >
> > I sent v2.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221226184537.744960-1-masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
>
> Sweet, thanks. Hopefully the automation likes that version better :)
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
