On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 11:19:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:55 PM Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 11:06 AM Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:21 PM Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 5:10 AM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 3:07 AM Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RISC-V Debug specification includes Sdtrig ISA extension. This extension > > > > > > > > describes Trigger Module. Triggers can cause a breakpoint exception, > > > > > > > > entry into Debug Mode, or a trace action without having to execute a > > > > > > > > special instruction. For native debugging triggers can be used to > > > > > > > > implement hardware breakpoints and watchpoints. > > > > > > > > > > > > ... [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Despite missing userspace debug, initial implementation can be tested > > > > > > > > on QEMU using kernel breakpoints, e.g. see samples/hw_breakpoint and > > > > > > > > register_wide_hw_breakpoint. Hardware breakpoints work on upstream QEMU. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should also be able to enable the use of HW breakpoints (and > > > > > > > watchpoints, modulo the issue mentioned below) in kdb, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting. So far I didn't think about using hw breakpoints in kgdb. > > > > > > I took a quick look at riscv and arm64 kgdb code. It looks like there > > > > > > is nothing wrong in adding arch-specific implementation of the function > > > > > > 'kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint' that will use hw breakpoints if possible. > > > > > > Besides it looks like in this case it makes sense to handle KGDB earlier > > > > > > than hw breakpoints in do_trap_break. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However this is not the case for watchpoints since there is no way to > > > > > > > > figure out which watchpoint is triggered. IIUC there are two possible > > > > > > > > options for doing this: using 'hit' bit in tdata1 or reading faulting > > > > > > > > virtual address from STVAL. QEMU implements neither of them. Current > > > > > > > > implementation opts for STVAL. So the following experimental QEMU patch > > > > > > > > is required to make watchpoints work: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > > > > > > : index 278d163803..8858be7411 100644 > > > > > > > > : --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > > > > > > : +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > > > > > > : @@ -1639,6 +1639,10 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) > > > > > > > > : case RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT: > > > > > > > > : tval = env->bins; > > > > > > > > : break; > > > > > > > > : + case RISCV_EXCP_BREAKPOINT: > > > > > > > > : + tval = env->badaddr; > > > > > > > > : + env->badaddr = 0x0; > > > > > > > > : + break; > > > > > > > > : default: > > > > > > > > : break; > > > > > > > > : } > > > > > > > > : diff --git a/target/riscv/debug.c b/target/riscv/debug.c > > > > > > > > : index 26ea764407..b4d1d566ab 100644 > > > > > > > > : --- a/target/riscv/debug.c > > > > > > > > : +++ b/target/riscv/debug.c > > > > > > > > : @@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ void riscv_cpu_debug_excp_handler(CPUState *cs) > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > : if (cs->watchpoint_hit) { > > > > > > > > : if (cs->watchpoint_hit->flags & BP_CPU) { > > > > > > > > : + env->badaddr = cs->watchpoint_hit->hitaddr; > > > > > > > > : cs->watchpoint_hit = NULL; > > > > > > > > : do_trigger_action(env, DBG_ACTION_BP); > > > > > > > > : } > > > > > > > > > > > > ... [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) > > > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp); > > > > > > > > + struct sbi_dbtr_data_msg *xmit; > > > > > > > > + struct sbi_dbtr_id_msg *recv; > > > > > > > > + struct perf_event **slot; > > > > > > > > + struct sbiret ret; > > > > > > > > + int err = 0; > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + xmit = kzalloc(SBI_MSG_SZ_ALIGN(sizeof(*xmit)), GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > > > > > + if (!xmit) { > > > > > > > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > > > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > + recv = kzalloc(SBI_MSG_SZ_ALIGN(sizeof(*recv)), GFP_ATOMIC); > > > > > > > > + if (!recv) { > > > > > > > > + err = -ENOMEM; > > > > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do these really need to be dynamically allocated? > > > > > > > > > > > > According to SBI extension proposal, base address of this memory chunk > > > > > > must be 16-bytes aligned. To simplify things, buffer with 'power of two > > > > > > bytes' size (and >= 16 bytes) is allocated. In this case alignment of > > > > > > the kmalloc buffer is guaranteed to be at least this size. IIUC more > > > > > > efforts are needed to guarantee such alignment for a buffer on stack. > > > > > > > > You should be able to declare the struct with __aligned(16) to get the > > > > desired alignment on the stack. > > > > > > > > > Stack is not appropriate for this. Please use a per-CPU global > > > > > data for this purpose which should be 16 byte aligned as well. > > > > > > > > Is the desire to not use the stack purely a defensive measure, i.e. to > > > > defend against a buggy or malicious firmware/hypervisor? That's fine, > > > > I'm just curious if there's rationale beyond that (though I'd argue > > > > we're already implicitly trusting whatever software is sitting below > > > > us). > > > > > > The kernel stack is fixed size so it is best to avoid large structures > > > or arrays on kernel stack. > > > > Of course, though I'm not sure I'd consider 32 bytes "large" :) > > The current patch only configures one trigger at a time but if > we are configuring multiple triggers in one-go then the trigger > array will grow. Existing architecture-specific calls (e.g. arch_install_hw_breakpoint) handle a single breakpoint. IIUC we may have to setup multiple triggers at once for masked watchpoints. A masked watchpoint watches many addresses simultanously, e.g. see https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Set-Watchpoints.html. Masked watchpoints can be converted into chained triggers which would require configuring multiple triggers in one-go. Do you have any other use-cases in mind ? Regards, Sergey