On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 02:06:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 12:56:03PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > How about we split this like:
> >
> > | /*
> > | * Prevent the compiler from instrumenting this code in any way
> > | * This does not prevent instrumentation via KPROBES, which must be
> > | * prevented through other means if necessary.
>
> Perhaps point to NOINSTR_TEXT in vmlinux.lds.h
Makes sense, will do.
>
> > | */
> > | #define __no_compiler_instrument \
> > | noinline notrace noinline notrace __no_kcsan \
> > | __no_sanitize_address __no_sanitize_coverage
> > |
> > | /*
> > | * Section for code which can't be instrumented at all.
> > | * Any code in this section cannot be instrumented with KPROBES.
> > | */
> > | #define noinstr __no_compiler_instrument section(".noinstr.text")
> >
> > ... then we don't need __noinstr_section(), and IMO the split is
> > clearer.
>
> Yeah, perhaps, no strong feelings. Note I have this in the sched-idle
> series as well (which I still need to rebase and repost :/).
Ah; I'll sit on this for now then, and once that's all in I can send a
cleanup/rework patch. Sorry for the noise!
Thanks,
Mark.
