On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:06 PM Gabriel Paubert <paubert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok, I´ve just tried it, except that I had something slightly different in
> mind, but perhaps should have been clearer in my first post.
>
> I have change your code to the following:
I actually tested that, but using a slightly different version, and my
non-union test case ended up like
size_t strlen(const char *p)
{
return __builtin_strlen(p);
}
and then gcc actually complains about
warning: infinite recursion detected
and I (incorrectly) thought this was unworkable. But your version
seems to work fine.
So yeah, for the kernel I think we could do something like this. It's
ugly, but it gets rid of the crazy warning.
Practically speaking this might be a bit painful, because we've got
several different variations of this all due to all the things like
our debugging versions (see <linux/fortify-string.h> for example), so
some of our code is this crazy jungle of "with this config, use this
wrapper".
But if somebody wants to deal with the '-Wpointer-sign' warnings,
there does seem to be a way out. Maybe with another set of helper
macros, creating those odd __transparent_union__ wrappers might even
end up reasonable.
It's not like we don't have crazy macros for function wrappers
elsewhere (the SYSCALL macros come to mind - shudder). The macros
themselves may be a nasty horror, but when done right the _use_ point
of said macros can be nice and clean.
Linus
