Re: [PATCH v2 00/39] Shadowstacks for userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:57:48AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > >
> > > If you don't want /proc/$pid/mem to be able to do stuff like that,
> > > then IMO the way to go is to change when /proc/$pid/mem uses
> > > FOLL_FORCE, or to limit overall write access to /proc/$pid/mem.
> > 
> > Yeah, all reasonable. I just wish we could ditch FOLL_FORCE; it continues
> > to weird me out how powerful that fd's side-effects are.
> 
> Could you remove FOLL_FORCE from /proc/$pid/mem and add a
> /proc/$pid/mem_force that enable FOLL_FORCE but requires root
> (or similar) access.
> 
> Although I suspect gdb may like to have write access to
> code?

As Jann has reminded me out of band, while FOLL_FORCE is still worrisome,
it's really /proc/$pid/mem access at all without an active ptrace
attachment (and to self).

Here's my totally untested idea to require access to /proc/$pid/mem
having an established ptrace relationship:

diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h
index c952c5ba8fab..0393741eeabb 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ extern void exit_ptrace(struct task_struct *tracer, struct list_head *dead);
 #define PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT	0x04
 #define PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS	0x08
 #define PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS	0x10
+#define PTRACE_MODE_ATTACHED	0x20
 
 /* shorthands for READ/ATTACH and FSCREDS/REALCREDS combinations */
 #define PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS (PTRACE_MODE_READ | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 93f7e3d971e4..fadec587d133 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static int __mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int mode)
 
 static int mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	int ret = __mem_open(inode, file, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH);
+	int ret = __mem_open(inode, file, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACHED);
 
 	/* OK to pass negative loff_t, we can catch out-of-range */
 	file->f_mode |= FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET;
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 1893d909e45c..c97e6d734ae5 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
 	 * or halting the specified task is impossible.
 	 */
 
+	/*
+	 * If an existing ptrace relationship is required, not even
+	 * introspection is allowed.
+	 */
+	if ((mode & PTRACE_MODE_ATTACHED) && ptrace_parent(task) != current)
+		return -EPERM;
 	/* Don't let security modules deny introspection */
 	if (same_thread_group(task, current))
 		return 0;

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux