Re: [PATCH V5 08/11] riscv: Support HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2022/9/18 23:52, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
index 5f49517cd3a2..426529b84db0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
@@ -332,6 +332,33 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread)
  	tail syscall_exit_to_user_mode
  ENDPROC(ret_from_kernel_thread)
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_STACKS
+ENTRY(call_on_stack)
+	/* Create a frame record to save our ra and fp */
+	addi	sp, sp, -RISCV_SZPTR
+	REG_S	ra, (sp)
+	addi	sp, sp, -RISCV_SZPTR
+	REG_S	fp, (sp)
+
+	/* Save sp in fp */
+	move	fp, sp
+
+	/* Move to the new stack and call the function there */
+	li	a3, IRQ_STACK_SIZE
+	add	sp, a1, a3
+	jalr	a2
+
+	/*
+	 * Restore sp from prev fp, and fp, ra from the frame
+	 */
+	move	sp, fp
+	REG_L	fp, (sp)
+	addi	sp, sp, RISCV_SZPTR
+	REG_L	ra, (sp)
+	addi	sp, sp, RISCV_SZPTR
+	ret
+ENDPROC(call_on_stack)
+#endif

Seems my compiler (riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc 8.4.0, cross compiling from x86) cannot recognize the register `fp`.

After I changed it to `s0` this can pass compiling.


Seems there is nowhere else using `fp`, can this just using `s0` instead?

Best,

Chen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux