Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] LoongArch: Enable ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:22 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Arnd,
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 8:18 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 1:25 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > To avoid the following build error on LoongArch we should include linux/
> > > static_key.h in page-flags.h.
> > >
> > > In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
> > > from ./include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> > > from ./include/linux/mm.h:7,
> > > from arch/loongarch/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: warning: data definition has no
> > > type or storage class
> > > 208 | DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:208:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in
> > > declaration of 'DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE' [-Werror=implicit-int]
> > > ./include/linux/page-flags.h:209:26: warning: parameter names (without
> > > types) in function declaration
> >
> > I wonder if page_fixed_fake_head() should be moved out of line to avoid
> > this, it's already nontrivial here, and that would avoid the static key
> > in a central header.
> I have some consideration here. I think both inline function and
> static key are instruments to make things faster, in other words,
> page_fixed_fake_head() is a performance critical function. If so, it
> is not suitable to move it out of line.

+1

The static key is an optimization when HVO is disabled.

Thanks.

>
> Huacai
> >
> >        Arnd
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux