From: guoren@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 28 June 2022 09:17
>
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove unnecessary atomic_read in arch_spin_value_unlocked(lock),
> because the value has been in lock. This patch could prevent
> arch_spin_value_unlocked contend spin_lock data again.
I'm confused (as usual).
Isn't atomic_read() pretty much free?
..
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> index fdfebcb050f4..f1e4fa100f5a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h
> @@ -84,7 +84,9 @@ static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>
> static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> {
> - return !arch_spin_is_locked(&lock);
> + u32 val = lock.counter;
> +
> + return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff));
That almost certainly needs a READ_ONCE().
The result is also inherently stale.
So the uses must be pretty limited.
David
> }
>
> #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> --
> 2.36.1
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
