On 2022-06-14 15:32:16 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Yes, I saw these, and that's why I wondered about it, because they looked > like they should not be applied independently. > > > I could group this softirq change for all architectures in a single > > patch. But then powerpc didn't want the "PREEMPT_RT" annotation for the > > warning/ stack backtrace and they may not be too keen about this. So for > > powerpc I was thinking to present them all at once. > > Looking at sparc and parisc, there might be more to it than just this. > > Both were never tested while I have the missing bits for arm* and > > powerpc in my queue. > > > > Eitherway, if you want I can regroup and send you the softirq bits for > > all arches. > > Yes, I think this would be good. These are still targeted for next, right? Yup. Let me do this then. > Arnd Sebastian
