Re: [PATCH V9 20/20] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thx Heiko & Guenter,

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:10 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 12:57:30 CEST schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 00:06:46 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 01:46:38AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > > > The problem is come from "__dls3's vdso decode part in musl's
> > > > > ldso/dynlink.c". The ehdr->e_phnum & ehdr->e_phentsize are wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the root cause is from musl's implementation with the wrong
> > > > > elf parser. I would fix that soon.
> > > > Not elf parser, it's "aux vector just past environ[]". I think I could
> > > > solve this, but anyone who could help dig in is welcome.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure I understand what you are saying here. Point is that my
> > > root file system, generated with musl a year or so ago, crashes with
> > > your patch set applied. That is a regression, even if there is a bug
> > > in musl.
Thx for the report, it's a valuable regression for riscv-compat.

> >
> > Also as I said in the other part of the thread, the rootfs seems innocent,
> > as my completely-standard Debian riscv64 rootfs is also affected.
> >
> > The merged version seems to be v12 [0] - not sure how we this discussion
> > ended up in v9, but I just tested this revision in two variants:
> >
> > - v5.17 + this v9 -> works nicely
>
> I take that back ... now going back to that build I somehow also run into
> that issue here ... will investigate more.
Yeah, it's my fault. I've fixed up it, please have a try:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220525160404.2930984-1-guoren@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

>
>
> > - v5.18-rc6 + this v9 (rebased onto it) -> breaks the boot
> >   The only rebase-conflict was with the introduction of restartable
> >   sequences and removal of the tracehook include, but turning CONFIG_RSEQ
> >   off doesn't seem to affect the breakage.
> >
> > So it looks like something changed between 5.17 and 5.18 that causes the issue.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220405071314.3225832-1-guoren@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux