Re: [PATCH 1/7] kthread: Don't allocate kthread_struct for init and umh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I'm worried that there are more of these issues lurking. Haven't looked
>> yet.
>
> I looked earlier and I missed this one.  I am going to look again today,
> along with applying the obvious fix to task_tick_numa.

So I have just looked again and I don't see anything.  There are a
couple of subtle issues on x86.  Especially with saving floating
point but as I read the code copy_thread initializes things
properly so that code that doesn't touch floating point registers
doesn't need to do anything.

The important thing for lurking issues is that even if I missed
something practically all of the uses of PF_KTHREAD are on x86
or generic code so they should be flushed out quickly.

Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux