On Thu, 05 May 2022 04:09:46 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:36 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Comments on the v3 looked pretty straight-forward, essentially just that
RCsc issue I'd missed from the v2 and some cleanups. A part of the
discussion some additional possible cleanups came up related to the
qrwlock headers, but I hadn't looked at those yet and I had already
handled everything else. This went on the back burner, but given that
LoongArch appears to want to use it for their new port I think it's best
to just run with this and defer the other cleanups until later.
I've placed the whole patch set at palmer/tspinlock-v4, and also tagged
the asm-generic bits as generic-ticket-spinlocks-v4. Ideally I'd like
to take that, along with the RISC-V patches, into my tree as there's
some RISC-V specific testing before things land in linux-next. This
passes all my testing, but I'll hold off until merging things anywhere
else to make sure everyone has time to look. There's no rush on my end
for this one, but I don't want to block LoongArch so I'll try to stay a
bit more on top of this one.
I took another look as well and everything seems fine. I had expected
that I would merge it into the asm-generic tree first and did not bother
sending a separate Reviewed-by tag, but I agree that it's best if you
create the branch.
Can you add 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>'
to each patch and send me a pull request for a v5 tag so we can
merge that into both the riscv and the asm-generic trees?
Yep. There were some other minor comments, I'll clean those up as well
and send something soon.
