On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 10:32 -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for > > those drivers using them. > > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > index 45764ec3b2eb..14e5998ee95c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ config GPIO_VR41XX > > > > config GPIO_VX855 > > tristate "VIA VX855/VX875 GPIO" > > - depends on (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) && PCI > > + depends on (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) && PCI && HAS_IOPORT > > select MFD_CORE > > select MFD_VX855 > > help > > -- > > 2.32.0 > > I noticed a number of other GPIO drivers make use of inb()/outb() -- for > example the PC104 drivers -- should the respective Kconfigs for those > drivers also be adjusted here? > > William Breathitt Gray Good question. As far as I can see most (all?) of these have "select ISA_BUS_API" which is "def_bool ISA". Now "config ISA" seems to currently be repeated in architectures and doesn't have an explicit HAS_IOPORT dependency (it maybe should have one). But it does only make sense on architectures with HAS_IOPORT set.
