On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:20:47PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 4/11/22 13:00, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > Uhm, ping? > > What happened with the plan to move this function into the block layer? > I'm asking this because if that function is moved your patch will conflict > with the patch that moves that function. I believe you're thinking of lower_48_bits() instead of this unaligned accessor. It appears that patch hasn't been picked up yet though, and I am assuming it should go through block.
