On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:34 AM <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ generic-y += asm-offsets.h
> generic-y += extable.h
> generic-y += gpio.h
> generic-y += kvm_para.h
> +generic-y += ticket-lock.h
> +generic-y += ticket-lock-types.h
> generic-y += qrwlock.h
> generic-y += user.h
> generic-y += vmlinux.lds.h
If these headers are not included from architecture-independent code,
they should
not be marked as generic-y, same as for the qrwlock.h header
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock.h>
> #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
>
> ...
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock-types.h>
> #include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
>
So these should all become
#include <asm-generic/...h>
It would however make sense to have the trivial two-line version
of the two header files and put them into asm-generic/spinlock.h
and asm-generic/spinlock-types.h, replacing the current version.
If you do that, then you need a 'generic-y' line for spinlock.h,
but not for the other ones.
Arnd
