Re: [PATCH 2/4] locking: Apply contention tracepoints in the slow path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 05:04:10PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> @@ -80,7 +81,9 @@ static inline void queued_read_lock(struct qrwlock *lock)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* The slowpath will decrement the reader count, if necessary. */
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_BEGIN(lock, LCB_F_READ);
>  	queued_read_lock_slowpath(lock);
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_END(lock);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -94,7 +97,9 @@ static inline void queued_write_lock(struct qrwlock *lock)
>  	if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, &cnts, _QW_LOCKED)))
>  		return;
>  
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_BEGIN(lock, LCB_F_WRITE);
>  	queued_write_lock_slowpath(lock);
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_END(lock);
>  }

> @@ -82,7 +83,9 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>  	if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)))
>  		return;
>  
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_BEGIN(lock, 0);
>  	queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock, val);
> +	LOCK_CONTENTION_END(lock);
>  }

Can you please stick that _inside_ the slowpath? You really don't want
to inline that.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux