On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:46:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can you say why you didn't convert ia64? I don't see any set_fs() use > there, except for the unaligned handler, which looks trivial to > remove. It looks like the only reason for it is kernel-mode unaligned > exceptions, which we should just turn fatal, I suspect (they already > get logged). > > And ia64 people could make the unaligned handling do the kernel mode > case in emulate_load/store_int() - it doesn't look *that* painful. Are there any ia64 people left? :)
