On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:08 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:12 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > Most of the patches should be the same either way (adding back > missing includes to drivers, and doing cleanups to commonly > included headers to avoid the deep nesting), the interesting bit > will be how to properly define the larger structures without pulling > in the rest of the world. I'm wondering if the compiler can provide us the statistics of usage on a per custom type basis. In this case the highest frequency will probably mean that we better have that type in a separate header or tree of _independent_ headers. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
