On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:30:57PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:25:31PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Today the rules are a bit iffy and arbitrary about which kernel
> >> threads have struct kthread present. Both idle threads and thread
> >> started with create_kthread want struct kthread present so that is
> >> effectively all kernel threads. Make the rule that if PF_KTHREAD
> >> and the task is running then struct kthread is present.
> >>
> >> This will allow the kernel thread code to using tsk->exit_code
> >> with different semantics from ordinary processes.
> >>
> >> To make ensure that struct kthread is present for all
> >> kernel threads move it's allocation into copy_process.
> >>
> >> Add a deallocation of struct kthread in exec for processes
> >> that were kernel threads.
> >>
> >> Move the allocation of struct kthread for the initial thread
> >> earlier so that it is not repeated for each additional idle
> >> thread.
> >>
> >> Move the initialization of struct kthread into set_kthread_struct
> >> so that the structure is always and reliably initailized.
> >>
> >> Clear set_child_tid in free_kthread_struct to ensure the kthread
> >> struct is reliably freed during exec. The function
> >> free_kthread_struct does not need to clear vfork_done during exec as
> >> exec_mm_release called from exec_mmap has already cleared vfork_done.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch as commit 40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is
> > present for all kthreads") in -next causes an ARCH=arm
> > multi_v5_defconfig kernel to fail to boot in QEMU. I had to apply commit
> > 6692c98c7df5 ("fork: Stop protecting back_fork_cleanup_cgroup_lock with
> > CONFIG_NUMA") to get it to build and I applied commit dd621ee0cf8e
> > ("kthread: Warn about failed allocations for the init kthread") to avoid
> > the known runtime warning.
> >
> > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- distclean multi_v5_defconfig all
> >
> > $ qemu-system-arm \
> > -initrd rootfs.cpio \
> > -append earlycon \
> > -machine palmetto-bmc \
> > -no-reboot \
> > -dtb arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-palmetto.dtb \
> > -display none \
> > -kernel arch/arm/boot/zImage \
> > -m 512m \
> > -nodefaults \
> > -serial mon:stdio
> > qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.0 has no peer
> > qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.1 has no peer
> > Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> > Linux version 5.16.0-rc1-00016-g40966e316f86-dirty (nathan@archlinux-ax161) (arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2) #1 PREEMPT Wed Dec 22 18:08:53 UTC 2021
> > CPU: ARM926EJ-S [41069265] revision 5 (ARMv5TEJ), cr=00093177
> > CPU: VIVT data cache, VIVT instruction cache
> > OF: fdt: Machine model: Palmetto BMC
> > earlycon: ns16550a0 at MMIO 0x1e784000 (options '')
> > printk: bootconsole [ns16550a0] enabled
> > Memory policy: Data cache writethrough
> > cma: Reserved 16 MiB at 0x5b000000
> > Zone ranges:
> > DMA [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x000000005edfffff]
> > Normal empty
> > HighMem [mem 0x000000005ee00000-0x000000005fffffff]
> > Movable zone start for each node
> > Early memory node ranges
> > node 0: [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x000000005bffffff]
> > node 0: [mem 0x000000005c000000-0x000000005dffffff]
> > node 0: [mem 0x000000005e000000-0x000000005edfffff]
> > node 0: [mem 0x000000005ee00000-0x000000005fffffff]
> > Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x000000005fffffff]
> > Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 130084
> > Kernel command line: earlycon
> > Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes, linear)
> > Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes, linear)
> > mem auto-init: stack:off, heap alloc:off, heap free:off
> > Memory: 433140K/524288K available (9628K kernel code, 2019K rwdata, 2368K rodata, 340K init, 661K bss, 74764K reserved, 16384K cma-reserved, 0K highmem)
> > SLUB: HWalign=32, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1
> > rcu: Preemptible hierarchical RCU implementation.
> > rcu: RCU event tracing is enabled.
> > Trampoline variant of Tasks RCU enabled.
> > rcu: RCU calculated value of scheduler-enlistment delay is 10 jiffies.
> > NR_IRQS: 16, nr_irqs: 16, preallocated irqs: 16
> > i2c controller registered, irq 16
> > random: get_random_bytes called from start_kernel+0x408/0x624 with crng_init=0
> > clocksource: FTTMR010-TIMER2: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 79635851949 ns
> > sched_clock: 32 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 89478484971ns
> > Switching to timer-based delay loop, resolution 41ns
> > Console: colour dummy device 80x30
> > printk: console [tty0] enabled
> > printk: bootconsole [ns16550a0] disabled
> >
> > After that, it just hangs.
> >
> > The rootfs is available at https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/boot-utils
> > in the images/arm folder.
> >
> > If there is any more information that I can provide or changes to test,
> > please let me know.
>
> Well crap. I hate to hear my code is causing problems like this.
>
> This is however a very good bug report, which I very much appreciate.
>
> I think I have enough information. I will see if I can reproduce this
> and track down what is happening.
>
> Have you by any chance tried linux-next with just these changes backed
> out?
Yes, if I back out of the following commits on top of next-20211222 then
the kernel boots right up.
dd621ee0cf8e ("kthread: Warn about failed allocations for the init kthread")
ff8288ff475e ("fork: Rename bad_fork_cleanup_threadgroup_lock to bad_fork_cleanup_delayacct")
6692c98c7df5 ("fork: Stop protecting back_fork_cleanup_cgroup_lock with CONFIG_NUMA")
1fb466dff904 ("objtool: Add a missing comma to avoid string concatenation")
5eb6f22823e0 ("exit/kthread: Fix the kerneldoc comment for kthread_complete_and_exit")
6b1248798eb6 ("exit/kthread: Move the exit code for kernel threads into struct kthread")
40966e316f86 ("kthread: Ensure struct kthread is present for all kthreads")
Cheers,
Nathan
