C-SKY would follow this, thx. Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:05 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > There's currently a number of architectures that want/have graduated > from test-and-set locks and are looking at qspinlock. > > *HOWEVER* qspinlock is very complicated and requires a lot of an > architecture to actually work correctly. Specifically it requires > forward progress between a fair number of atomic primitives, including > an xchg16 operation, which I've seen a fair number of fundamentally > broken implementations of in the tree (specifically for qspinlock no > less). > > The benefit of qspinlock over ticket lock is also non-obvious, esp. > at low contention (the vast majority of cases in the kernel), and it > takes a fairly large number of CPUs (typically also NUMA) to make > qspinlock beat ticket locks. > > Esp. things like ARM64's WFE can move the balance a lot in favour of > simpler locks by reducing the cacheline pressure due to waiters (see > their smp_cond_load_acquire() implementation for details). > > Unless you've audited qspinlock for your architecture and found it > sound *and* can show actual benefit, simpler is better. > > Therefore provide ticket locks, which depend on a single atomic > operation (fetch_add) while still providing fairness. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h | 30 +++++++++ > include/asm-generic/ticket_lock_types.h | 11 +++ > include/asm-generic/ticket_lock.h | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+) > > --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h > +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h > @@ -2,6 +2,36 @@ > /* > * Queued spinlock > * > + * A 'generic' spinlock implementation that is based on MCS locks. An > + * architecture that's looking for a 'generic' spinlock, please first consider > + * ticket_lock.h and only come looking here when you've considered all the > + * constraints below and can show your hardware does actually perform better > + * with qspinlock. > + * > + * > + * It relies on smp_store_release() + atomic_*_acquire() to be RCsc (or no > + * weaker than RCtso if you're Power, also see smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()), > + * > + * It relies on a far greater (compared to ticket_lock.h) set of atomic > + * operations to behave well together, please audit them carefully to ensure > + * they all have forward progress. Many atomic operations may default to > + * cmpxchg() loops which will not have good forward progress properties on > + * LL/SC architectures. > + * > + * One notable example is atomic_fetch_or_acquire(), which x86 cannot (cheaply) > + * do. Carefully read the patches that introduced > + * queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(). > + * > + * It also heavily relies on mixed size atomic operations, in specific it > + * requires architectures to have xchg16; something which many LL/SC > + * architectures need to implement as a 32bit and+or in order to satisfy the > + * forward progress guarantees mentioned above. > + * > + * Further reading on mixed size atomics that might be relevant: > + * > + * http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/popl17/mixed-size.pdf > + * > + * > * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. > * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP > * > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_lock_types.h > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > + > +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H > +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H > + > +#include <linux/types.h> > +typedef atomic_t arch_spinlock_t; > + > +#define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED ATOMIC_INIT(0) > + > +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H */ > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_lock.h > @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > + > +/* > + * 'Generic' ticket lock implementation. > + * > + * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress > + * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick > + * to a test-and-set lock. > + * > + * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a > + * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although > + * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications > + * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with > + * a test-and-set. > + * > + * It relies on smp_store_release() + atomic_*_acquire() to be RCsc (or no > + * weaker than RCtso if you're Power, also see smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()), > + * > + * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the > + * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word > + * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example). > + * > + */ > + > +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H > +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H > + > +#include <linux/atomic.h> > +#include <asm/ticket_lock_types.h> > + > +#define ONE_TICKET (1 << 16) > +#define __ticket(val) (u16)((val) >> 16) > +#define __owner(val) (u16)((val) & 0xffff) > + > +static __always_inline bool __ticket_is_locked(u32 val) > +{ > + return __ticket(val) != __owner(val); > +} > + > +static __always_inline void ticket_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + u32 val = atomic_fetch_add_acquire(ONE_TICKET, lock); > + u16 ticket = __ticket(val); > + > + if (ticket == __owner(val)) > + return; > + > + atomic_cond_read_acquire(lock, ticket == __owner(VAL)); > +} > + > +static __always_inline bool ticket_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + u32 old = atomic_read(lock); > + > + if (__ticket_is_locked(old)) > + return false; > + > + return atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, &old, old + ONE_TICKET); > +} > + > +static __always_inline void ticket_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + __is_defined(__BIG_ENDIAN); > + u32 val = atomic_read(lock); > + > + smp_store_release(ptr, __owner(val) + 1); > +} > + > +static __always_inline int ticket_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + u32 val = atomic_read(lock); > + > + return (__ticket(val) - __owner(val)) > 1; > +} > + > +static __always_inline int ticket_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + return __ticket_is_locked(atomic_read(lock)); > +} > + > +static __always_inline int ticket_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock) > +{ > + return !__ticket_is_locked(lock.counter); > +} > + > +#undef __owner > +#undef __ticket > +#undef ONE_TICKET > + > +#define arch_spin_lock(l) ticket_lock(l) > +#define arch_spin_trylock(l) ticket_trylock(l) > +#define arch_spin_unlock(l) ticket_unlock(l) > +#define arch_spin_is_locked(l) ticket_is_locked(l) > +#define arch_spin_is_contended(l) ticket_is_contended(l) > +#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l) ticket_value_unlocked(l) > + > +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H */ -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/