On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 09:06:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:13:32AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:00 -0700, Yury Norov wrote: > > > > Ping again. > > > > > > > > The rebased series together with other bitmap patches can be found > > > > here: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/bitmap-20210716 > > > [] > > > > > .../bitops => include/linux}/find.h | 149 +++++++++++++++++- > > > > > > A file named find.h in a directory named bitops seems relatively sensible, > > > but a bitops specific file named find.h in include/linux does not. > > > > > > I'm OK with any name, it's not supposed to be included directly. What > > do you think about bitmap_find.h, or can you suggest a better name? > > Dunno. > > But I'm a bit curious about the duplicate function naming (conflicts?) > with functions in include/linux/bitmap.h What names duplicate?
