Re: [RFC][PATCH] signal/m68k: Use force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) in fpsp040_die

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Jul 26 2021, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S b/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S
>> index a8f41615d94a..ec767523c012 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/fpsp040/skeleton.S
>> @@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ in_ea:
>>  	.section .fixup,#alloc,#execinstr
>>  	.even
>>  1:
>> -	jbra	fpsp040_die
>> +	bsrl	fpsp040_die
>> +	jmp	.Lnotkern
>
> That should be jbra instead of jmp.

I will update my patch.  Mind if I ask what the difference is?

I could not find a reference mentioning jbra.  Do I need to look in the
gas source or do you know if there is a better source?

Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux