Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] arch: Introduce ARCH_HAS_HW_XCHG_SMALL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 2:36 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new Kconfig option ARCH_HAS_HW_XCHG_SMALL, which means arch
> has hardware sub-word xchg/cmpxchg support. This option will be used as
> an indicator to select the bit-field definition in the qspinlock data
> structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Adding a Kconfig conditional sounds like a good idea, but I have two
concerns about the specific implementation:

- I think we should have separate symbols for 8-bit, 16-bit and 64-bit
  cmpxchg(). I think every architecture needs to support at least 32-bit
  cmpxchg() and 64-bit architectures also need to support cmpxchg64().
  I actually have a prototype patch that introduces cmpxchg8() and
  cmpxchg16() helpers with the purpose of no longer supporting these
  width in the normal cmpxchg(), but that is mostly independent of
  whether we want a conditional or not.

- If I remember correctly, there were some concerns about whether using
  this information for picking the qspinlock implementation is a good idea.

         Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux