On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:39:49 +0300 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There will always be more informal discussions between on-site > participants. After all, this is one of the benefits of conferences, by > being all together we can easily organize ad-hoc discussions. This is > traditionally done by finding a not too noisy corner in the conference > center, would it be useful to have more break-out rooms with A/V > equipment than usual ? I've been giving this quite some thought too, and I've come to the understanding (and sure I can be wrong, but I don't think that I am), is that when doing a hybrid event, the remote people will always be "second class citizens" with respect to the communication that is going on. Saying that we can make it the same is not going to happen unless you start restricting what people can do that are present, and that will just destroy the conference IMO. That said, I think we should add more to make the communication better for those that are not present. Maybe an idea is to have break outs followed by the presentation and evening events that include remote attendees to discuss with those that are there about what they might have missed. Have incentives at these break outs (free stacks and beer?) to encourage the live attendees to attend and have a discussion with the remote attendees. The presentations would have remote access, where remote attendees can at the very least write in some chat their questions or comments. If video and connectivity is good enough, perhaps have a screen where they can show up and talk, but that may have logistical limitations. The evening events (including going out to the bars and just hanging with other developers) is a lost cause to try and have remote participation. Then the last day, perhaps have a bunch of rooms for various topics where people can come in and continue the conversation from the evening events but with a remote audience that can ask questions. Again, you may need to "bribe" the attendees to come to this and interact ;-) I'm all for making a better remote experience for hybrid events, but I'm against doing so by making it a worse experience for those that attend. Not saying that you suggested this, but I have heard of ideas about limiting what happens so that the live attendees do not have any advantage over the remote ones. -- Steve
