On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:43:08AM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 6/2/21 6:47 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > In preparation for restricting the affinity of a task during execve()
> > on arm64, introduce a new task_cpus_dl_admissible() helper function to
> > give an indication as to whether the restricted mask is admissible for
> > a deadline task.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 91a6cfeae242..9b17d8cfa6ef 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ extern void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new
> > extern int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
> > extern int dup_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src, int node);
> > extern void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
> > +extern bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask);
> > extern void force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
> > extern void relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p);
> > #else
> > @@ -1713,6 +1714,11 @@ static inline void release_user_cpus_ptr(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > WARN_ON(p->user_cpus_ptr);
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
> > +{
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > #endif
> >
> > extern int yield_to(struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 58e2cf7520c0..b4f8dc18ae11 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -6933,6 +6933,31 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr,
> > return retval;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +bool task_cpus_dl_admissible(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask)
>
> Would you mind renaming it to dl_task_check_affinity(), in the case of a v9? It
> will look coherent with dl_task_can_attach()...
Of course! I struggled with the naming myself, and your suggestion is much
better.
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers!
Will
