On 20/05/21 10:33, Quentin Perret wrote: > On Thursday 20 May 2021 at 11:16:41 (+0100), Will Deacon wrote: > > Ok, thanks for the insight. In which case, I'll go with what we discussed: > > require admission control to be disabled for sched_setattr() but allow > > execve() to a 32-bit task from a 64-bit deadline task with a warning (this > > is probably similar to CPU hotplug?). > > Still not sure that we can let execve go through ... It will break AC > all the same, so it should probably fail as well if AC is on IMO > Yeah, this was my thinking as well.
