On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 12:18:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Most per-architecture versions of these functions are broken in some form, > and they are almost certainly slower than the generic code as well. > > Remove the ones for hexagon and instead use the generic version. > This custom version reads the data twice for strncpy() by doing an extra > strnlen(), and it apparently lacks a check for user_addr_max(). I'd be tempted to just remove the first paragraph and reword the second as: Remove the hexagon implementation of strncpy/strnlen and instead use the generic versions. The hexago version of strncpy reads the data twice by doing an extra strnlen(), and it apparently lacks a check for user_addr_max().
