Re: [PATCH] arm64: Define only {pud/pmd}_{set/clear}_huge when usefull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Define only {pud/pmd}_{set/clear}_huge when usefull
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:00 -0700
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>, naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <73ec95f40cafbbb69bdfb43a7f53876fd845b0ce.1620990479.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
References: <73ec95f40cafbbb69bdfb43a7f53876fd845b0ce.1620990479.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

On Fri, 14 May 2021 11:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When PUD and/or PMD are folded, those functions are useless
> and we now have a stub in linux/pgtable.h

OK, help me out here please.  What patch does this fix?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: Define only {pud/pmd}_{set/clear}_huge when usefull
  - From: Christophe Leroy
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: Define only {pud/pmd}_{set/clear}_huge when usefull
  - From: Nathan Chancellor

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo: ABI fixes for v5.13-rc2
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/5] asm-generic: strncpy_from_user/strnlen_user cleanup
Previous by thread: [PATCH v15 0/6] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Define only {pud/pmd}_{set/clear}_huge when usefull
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux