Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] signal: sort out si_trapno and si_perf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 23:13, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This set of changes sorts out the ABI issues with SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF, and
> hopefully will can get merged before any userspace code starts using the
> new ABI.
>
> The big ideas are:
> - Placing the asserts first to prevent unexpected ABI changes
> - si_trapno becomming ordinary fault subfield.
> - struct signalfd_siginfo is almost full
>
> This set of changes starts out with Marco's static_assert changes and
> additional one of my own that enforces the fact that the alignment of
> siginfo_t is also part of the ABI.  Together these build time
> checks verify there are no unexpected ABI changes in the changes
> that follow.
>
> The field si_trapno is changed to become an ordinary extension of the
> _sigfault member of siginfo.
>
> The code is refactored a bit and then si_perf_type is added along side
> si_perf_data in the _perf subfield of _sigfault of siginfo_t.
>
> Finally the signalfd_siginfo fields are removed as they appear to be
> filling up the structure without userspace actually being able to use
> them.
>
> v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/m14kfjh8et.fsf_-_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/m1zgxfs7zq.fsf_-_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Eric W. Biederman (9):
>       signal: Verify the alignment and size of siginfo_t
>       siginfo: Move si_trapno inside the union inside _si_fault
>       signal: Implement SIL_FAULT_TRAPNO
>       signal: Use dedicated helpers to send signals with si_trapno set
>       signal: Remove __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
>       signal: Rename SIL_PERF_EVENT SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT for consistency
>       signal: Factor force_sig_perf out of perf_sigtrap
>       signal: Deliver all of the siginfo perf data in _perf
>       signalfd: Remove SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT fields from signalfd_siginfo
>
> Marco Elver (3):
>       sparc64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
>       arm: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
>       arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets

I can't seem to see the rest of them in my inbox. LKML also is missing
them: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/m1tuni8ano.fsf_-_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Something must have swallowed them. Could you resend?
I'll then test in the morning.

Thanks,
-- Marco



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux