On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 11:24 +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: Niklas Schnelle > > Sent: 21 April 2021 12:18 > > > > When PCI_IOBASE is not defined, it is set to 0 such that it is ignored > > in calls to the readX/writeX primitives. This triggers clang's > > -Wnull-pointer-arithmetic warning and will result in illegal accesses on > > platforms that do not support I/O ports if drivers do still attempt to > > access them. > > > > Make things explicit and silence the warning by letting inb() and > > friends fail with WARN_ONCE() and a 0xff... return in case PCI_IOBASE is > > not defined. > ... > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > index c6af40ce03be..aabb0a8186ee 100644 > > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h > ... > > @@ -458,12 +454,17 @@ static inline void writesq(volatile void __iomem *addr, const void *buffer, > > #define _inb _inb > > static inline u8 _inb(unsigned long addr) > > { > > +#ifdef PCI_IOBASE > > u8 val; > > > > __io_pbr(); > > val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); > > __io_par(val); > > return val; > > +#else > > + WARN_ONCE(1, "No I/O port support\n"); > > + return ~0; > > +#endif > > } > > #endif > > I suspect that this might be better not inlined > when PCI_IOBASE is undefined. > > Otherwise you get quite a lot of bloat from all the > WARN_ONCE() calls. > > David Hmm, I was wondering if we should rather have a large ifdef block of all these functions stubbed to WARN_ONCE rather than in each function. As I understand it this would be necessary if we want the inline gone. They would still be static though so we still get a copy per compilation unit that uses it or am I misunderstanding? > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) >